Comparative effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depression in 43,061 older adults with chronic somatic diseases: A Danish target trial emulation study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparative effectiveness of commonly used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for comorbid depression in older adults with chronic somatic diseases by applying a target-trial-emulation framework. METHODS: Danish target-trial-emulation study including 43,061 individuals aged ≥65 years (54.1% females, mean age 77.8 years) with a first redeemed prescription for depression with sertraline (n = 6673), escitalopram (n = 7104) or citalopram (n = 29,284) in 2006-2017. Individuals had cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD)/asthma, diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders, or osteoporosis. Outcomes were treatment switching, combination/augmentation, psychiatric hospital contact for depression, and any psychiatric in-patient care. Follow-up was one year and adjusted Cox regression analyses calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR) within each somatic disease. RESULTS: Across all six disease groups and four outcomes, we found that citalopram use, compared with sertraline, was associated with lower risks in several analyses, with statistically significant results in cancer, CVD, COPD/asthma, and diabetes (e.g., HRRs for psychiatric hospital contacts for depression/any psychiatric in-patient care ranging between 0.47 and 0.61). For escitalopram, compared with sertraline, some analyses indicated poorer outcomes with significantly higher risks for combination/augmentation treatment (HRRs ranging between 1.15 and 1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Although observational studies are prone to confounding, these findings indicate clinically relevant differences between the SSRIs, with better outcomes in citalopram users and poorer outcomes in escitalopram users than sertraline, urging the need for clinical studies in this vulnerable patient population.

Real-World Evidence on Clinical Outcomes of Commonly Used Antidepressants in Older Adults Initiating Antidepressants for Depression: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the clinical outcomes of commonly used antidepressants among older adults who initiated first-time antidepressants for depression by analyzing the 1-year risk of selected clinically relevant outcomes. METHODS: This cohort study used nationwide Danish registry data and included all older adults who redeemed a first-time (since 1995) antidepressant prescription with an indication of depression between 2006 and 2017. Only the 10 most frequently redeemed antidepressants were included in the analyses. Outcomes included discontinuation, switching, augmentation, psychiatric hospital contacts, suicide attempt or self-harm, fall-related injuries, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Poisson regression models, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: The study sample included 93,883 older adults (mean age, 78.0 years, SD=7.5 years; 56% female). The most frequently prescribed antidepressants were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, 47.04%; escitalopram, 11.81%; fluoxetine, 0.55%; paroxetine, 0.52%; sertraline, 11.17%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine, 0.71%; venlafaxine, 1.54%), a tricyclic antidepressant (amitriptyline, 1.86%), and two atypical antidepressants (mianserin, 1.93%; mirtazapine, 22.87%). Compared with users of sertraline (the reference drug in this analysis, as Danish guidelines recommend it as the first-choice treatment for depression), users of most of the other nine antidepressants had a significantly higher risk of discontinuation (e.g., mirtazapine: IRR=1.55, 95% CI=1.50-1.61; venlafaxine: IRR=1.22, 95% CI=1.12-1.32), switching (amitriptyline: IRR=1.45, 95% CI=1.15-1.81; venlafaxine: IRR=1.47, 95% CI=1.20-1.80), augmentation, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Overall, mirtazapine and venlafaxine users had the most adverse outcomes compared with sertraline users. These results remained consistent in analyses stratified by sex and age (≤75 years vs. >75 years). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world evidence suggests that clinical outcomes may vary among initiators of commonly used antidepressants in older adults, which may inform benefit-risk evaluation at treatment initiation, and highlights the importance of careful selection of antidepressant treatment.

Proton pump inhibitors and dementia: A nationwide population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase dementia risk. However, it is currently unknown whether timing of exposure or age at dementia diagnosis influence the risk. METHODS: We assessed associations between cumulative PPI use and dementia at different ages in a nationwide Danish cohort of 1,983,785 individuals aged 60 to 75 years between 2000 and 2018. RESULTS: During follow-up, there were 99,384 all-cause dementia incidences. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of dementia with PPI ever-use compared with never-use was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.29 to 1.43) for age 60 to 69 years at diagnosis, 1.12 (1.09 to 1.15) for 70 to 79 years, 1.06 (1.03 to 1.09) for 80 to 89 years, and 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17) for 90+ years. Longer treatment duration yielded increasing IRRs. For cases below 90 years, increased dementia rate was observed regardless of treatment initiation up to >15 years before diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Regardless of timing of treatment initiation, PPI use was associated with increased dementia rate before age 90 years. Dementia rates increased with younger age at diagnosis. HIGHLIGHTS: After following 1,983,785 individuals for a median of 10 years, 99,384 developed dementia PPIs were used by 21.2% of cases and 18.9% of controls PPI use was associated with increased dementia rate regardless of time of treatment onset Magnitude of associations increased with younger age at diagnosis PPI use was not associated with dementia occurring after age 90 years.

Do sociodemographic and clinical factors affect the selection of initial antidepressant treatment for depression in older adults? Results from a nationwide descriptive study in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: The choice of antidepressants for initial pharmacological treatment of depression in older adults and associated patients' characteristics are understudied. We aimed to describe the first selected antidepressant (first-choice) for depression in older adults (≥65 years) and whether patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics influence selecting an alternative first-choice (any other antidepressant than the nationally recommended first-choice sertraline) in Denmark. METHODS: Register-based cross-sectional study including all older adults who redeemed their first antidepressant prescription for depression at community pharmacies in Denmark in 2015-2019. We analyzed the effect of patients' characteristics on the first-choice antidepressant selection using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 34,337 older adults with a first antidepressant-prescription, over two-thirds filled alternative first-choice antidepressants than sertraline (28.9 %): escitalopram or citalopram (30.3 %) or mirtazapine (34.4 %). Socially disadvantaged older adults (e.g., with short educational attainment, being single, or of non-western ethnicity) and clinically vulnerable older adults (e.g., having somatic diagnoses and hospital contacts) were more likely to use alternative first-choice antidepressants. LIMITATIONS: Information on prescribers and in-hospital medications was not included in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation of the first antidepressant selection and its impact on depression treatment outcomes in older adults is necessary. Moreover, for older patients, national guidelines on depression treatment should be more specific. ARTICLE SUMMARY: Antidepressant selection for initial pharmacological treatment of depression in older adults can be difficult due to comorbidity, polypharmacy, and age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Real-world evidence/knowledge on first-choice antidepressant selection and associated user characteristics are rare. This Danish register-based cross-sectional study found over two-thirds of older adults filled alternative antidepressants (primarily escitalopram/citalopram or mirtazapine) than nationally recommended first-choice sertraline for depression treatment and identified wide-ranging sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing the first antidepressant selection.

Maternal antipsychotic use during pregnancy and congenital malformations.

BACKGROUND: Existing data may underestimate the potential teratogenic effects of prenatal antipsychotic exposure because of lacking data on miscarriages and induced abortions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present a comprehensive analysis based on information on pregnancies ending in termination, miscarriage, stillbirth, and live birth. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark of clinically recognized singleton pregnancies with the first-trimester scan performed from 2008 to 2017. We compared the risk of major malformations between pregnancies exposed to antipsychotics in the first trimester and unexposed pregnancies. In secondary analyses, the comparison was made with pregnancies of women who used antipsychotics before but not during pregnancy (discontinuers). We used weighted log-binomial regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and propensity score fine stratifications for confounding control. We performed 4 sensitivity analyses, including a sibling-controlled analysis. RESULTS: Of the 503,158 pregnancies, 1252 (0.2%) were of women who filled an antipsychotic prescription in the first trimester. Major malformations were present in 7.3% of antipsychotic-exposed pregnancies, 5.1% of unexposed pregnancies, and 6.0% of discontinuers' pregnancies. The adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.50) among exposed pregnancies compared with unexposed pregnancies. The prevalence ratio was attenuated to 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.48) compared with discontinuers and 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-2.49) in the sibling analysis. Similar findings were observed with cardiac malformations. Results were consistent for classes and individual antipsychotics, and remained robust across the 4 sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest limited or no overall teratogenic effect of first-trimester antipsychotic exposure. For individual antipsychotics, with estimations based on very few cases, further studies with sufficient sample sizes are warranted.

Trends, Patterns and Associated User Characteristics of Antidepressant Prescriptions in Older Adults: A Nationwide Descriptive Cohort Study in Denmark.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antidepressant use in older adults (≥ 65 years) is understudied in large population-based samples, particularly in recent years and regarding user characteristics. We aimed to describe the trends, patterns, and associated user characteristics of all antidepressant prescriptions redeemed by older adults at community pharmacies in Denmark during 2015-2019. METHODS: This register-based study used a cross-sectional design to characterize antidepressant prescription trends and patterns, and a cohort design to describe user characteristics associated with antidepressant prescription initiation. We used descriptive statistics to characterize trends and patterns, and Poisson regression for analyzing user characteristics. RESULTS: During the years 2015-2019, 17.9% of 1.2 million older adults redeemed 4.84 million antidepressant prescriptions, where 48.5% were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, followed by noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (26.2%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (12.7%), tricyclic antidepressants (11.2%), and others (1.4%). Amitriptyline and nortriptyline, considered potentially inappropriate medications, were among the 10 most frequently redeemed antidepressants. Only 60.5% of prescriptions had a treatment indication of depression. Prescription-proportion trends by drug classes and individual antidepressants remained consistent. A higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of initiating antidepressants was associated with female sex (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34), older age (e.g., 81-85 years vs. 65-70 years: IRR 1.74, 95% CI 1.44-2.11), living in rural areas (North Denmark vs. Capital Region: IRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.58), and having somatic and psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., per one psychiatric diagnosis: IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15), while a lower ratio was associated with being non-Western (vs. Danish: IRR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.89) and having hospital contacts for psychiatric treatment (per each contact: IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-1.00). CONCLUSION: SSRIs were the most commonly redeemed antidepressants, with consistent trends in Danish older adults. Besides clinical conditions, sociodemographics, e.g., sex, age, ethnicity, and place of residence, may influence antidepressant use.

Concurrent use of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications with antidepressants in older adults: A nationwide descriptive study in Denmark during 2015-2019.

OBJECTIVE: Concurrent polypharmacy and potentially-inappropriate-medication (PIMs) use with antidepressants in older adults is understudied. We investigated the prevalence and associated user characteristics of concurrent polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) and PIMs with antidepressants in all older adults (≥65 years) in Denmark based on prescriptions filled at community pharmacies during 2015-2019. METHOD: We applied a cross-sectional and cohort study design using socio-demographic and clinical data from Danish registers. RESULTS: A total of 261,479 older adults (mean age 76 years, females 63%) redeemed at least one prescription of antidepressants during 2015-2019. The prevalence of polypharmacy was 73%, and PIMs was 56%, with over 80% using at least one other nervous system drug or cardiovascular system drug concomitantly with antidepressants. Characteristics associated with higher concurrent use of polypharmacy and PIM with antidepressants were older age, marital status as widow/widower/separated/single, place of residence predominantly in the rural regions, non-western origin, and having somatic diagnoses. Some characteristics showed opposite directions of the associations with the two outcomes, including previous antidepressant use and psychiatric diagnoses being associated with higher use of polypharmacy but lower use of PIM. CONCLUSION: High polypharmacy and PIM use with antidepressants underline the importance of regularly reviewing pharmacological treatments in older adults with depression.

Antidepressant treatment initiation and public sick-leave compensation in the following year: a register-based prospective cohort study in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: Mental disorders have caused increasing sickness absence and related benefit claims in the OECD countries. This study investigates the association between antidepressant treatment initiation and public sick leave compensation (PLSC) in the following year in Denmark. METHODS: The study was designed as a register-based prospective cohort study. We included 39,401 adults (aged 18-65 years) with at least 12 consecutive months of full-time labour market attachment who had initiated first-time antidepressant monotherapy for depression or anxiety between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. PLSC was estimated for the year following the incident prescription of various antidepressants for depression or anxiety disorders. RESULTS: The most frequently prescribed antidepressant medication was SSRIs (66.8%), with sertraline being the leading choice. Compared with sertraline, mirtazapine and mianserin were associated with the highest risks of PSLC in the year following initiation, with IRRs of 2.74 (95% CI: 2.63 to 2.86) and 5.79 (95% CI: 5.18 to 6.47), respectively. Compared with sertraline, citalopram (IRR 1.22, 95%CI 1.17-1.28), venlafaxine (IRR 1.34, 95%CI 1.23-1.45) and duloxetine (IRR 1.48, 95%CI 1.35-1.62) were all associated with increased PSLC. In contrast, paroxetine (IRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98), fluoxetine (IRR 0.51, 95%CI 0.42-0.62) and vortioxetine (IRR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.97) were all associated with a significantly lower risk of PSLC compared with sertraline. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant treatment initiation was associated with PLSC. The highest risk of PLSC was seen for antidepressants with sedative side effects. Some types of antidepressants were associated with a lower risk of PLSC in the year following treatment initiation.

Treatment indications and potential off-label use of antidepressants among older adults: A population-based descriptive study in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: Off-label prescriptions of antidepressants may be of special concern in older-adults. We aimed to study the potential off-label use of antidepressants among adults ≥65 years by describing the patterns, trends, and factors associated with missing and unspecified treatment indications. METHODS: We used registry data to describe indications of all antidepressant prescriptions (N = 13.8 million) redeemed by older-adults in 2006-2019. We investigated factors associated with off-label use by considering prescriptions with missing and unspecified indications of the first antidepressant prescription using a multinomial logistic regression with the 'depression' indication as a reference category and reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Overall, 18.1% of all antidepressant prescriptions had missing indications, and 9.9% had unspecified indications. The proportion of potential off-label use based on missing and unspecified prescriptions remained mostly consistent during 2006-2019. We identified similar associations in user characteristics whether considering missing or unspecified first prescription. ORs with 95% CI were raised in non-western ethnicity (vs. Danish, 1.12 (0.99-1.26) for missing indication and 1.28 (1.11-1.48) for unspecified indication) and female sex (vs. male, 1.05 (1.02-1.07) and 1.05 (1.02-1.07) respectively). ORs were reduced for shorter educational attainment (vs. long, 0.90 (0.87-0.94) and 0.92 (0.88-0.96)), older age (≥81 vs. 67-70 years, 0.66 (0.65-0.71) and 0.73 (0.70-0.76)) and hospital psychiatric diagnosis (per diagnosis 0.76 (0.73-0.78) and 0.88 (0.86-0.91)). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of all antidepressant prescriptions redeemed by older-adults in Denmark had either missing or unspecified treatment indications. Whether these prescriptions were actual off-label use needs to be validated. Clinicians should pay special attention to patients' characteristics linking missing and unspecified indications and maintain adequate documentation while prescribing medication.

Psychopharmacological treatment patterns prior to a schizophrenia diagnosis: A Danish nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with schizophrenia experience psychiatric symptoms long before being diagnosed. We investigated patterns of pre-diagnostic psychopharmacological treatment in individuals diagnosed with first-episode schizophrenia during the last two decades. DESIGN: Using Danish nationwide healthcare registers, we identified all individuals aged ≥10 years registered with their first ICD-10 schizophrenia diagnosis between January 1999 and March 2019. For each calendar year from 1999 to 2019, we calculated the proportion of patients - among those having received their first schizophrenia diagnosis in the respective calendar year - who redeemed prescriptions for various psychotropics in the two years preceding the schizophrenia diagnosis. We calculated proportions of all pre-diagnostic prescriptions since 1995 for a sub-population diagnosed 2011-2019 and for an age- and sex-matched reference group without schizophrenia. RESULTS: Among 33,361 individuals with schizophrenia (58 % males), the schizophrenia incidence rate was stable during the study period but the mean age at diagnosis decreased by >10 years. In the two pre-diagnostic years, 69 % received psychopharmacological treatment (52 % antipsychotics, 40 % antidepressants). This was stable between 1999 and 2019. Among 14,425 individuals diagnosed 2011-2019, psychotropic drug use was observed among 14-20 % between 24 and 10 years before the diagnosis, being four times higher than the reference group. Particularly antipsychotic and antidepressant drug use increased steadily during the ten pre-diagnostic years. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-diagnostic psychotropic drug use in schizophrenia was frequent but stable between 1999 and 2019 despite an earlier identification of schizophrenia patients. Our findings emphasize the continued importance of thorough diagnostic interviews, particularly among patients in need of antipsychotic treatment.

Free-of-charge dispensing of antipsychotics for schizophrenia in Denmark: Impact on the nationwide prescription registry and redemption of somatic medications.

OBJECTIVE: Free-of-charge dispensing of antipsychotics for schizophrenia was introduced in Denmark around 2008. However, free-of-charge dispensing is not recorded in the Danish National Prescription Register (DNPR), potentially introducing bias and misclassification. METHODS: We identified all 30 275 individuals with a first-episode schizophrenia diagnosis in Denmark between 1 January 1999 and 1 March 2017 including all redeemed prescriptions registered in the DNPR during the 2 years after the schizophrenia diagnosis. For each calendar year, we calculated the proportion of individuals who had filled ≥1 prescription for psychotropic and/or somatic medications within the first 2 years after the schizophrenia diagnosis. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2017, the proportion of individuals with prescription-records for any psychotropic medication during the 2 years after the schizophrenia diagnosis decreased from 88% to 74%, particularly antipsychotics (from 83% to 61%) and antidepressants (from 49% to 35%). This was particularly observed among those aged 18-30 years at the schizophrenia diagnosis. A similar decrease was not observed for prescription-records of somatic medications. CONCLUSION: The introduction of free-of-charge antipsychotics has affected the redemption of specific psychotropic drugs in the DNPR in first-episode schizophrenia. This limitation needs to be considered in register-based studies and emphasizes the need to identify solutions.

Clinical Impact of Functional CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 Gene Variants on Treatment with Antidepressants in Young People with Depression: A Danish Cohort Study.

Background: The clinical impact of the functional CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene variants on antidepressant treatment in people with depression is not well studied. Here, we evaluate the utility of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in psychiatry by investigating the association between the phenotype status of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19/2D6 enzymes and the one-year risks of clinical outcomes in patients with depression with incident new-use of (es)citalopram, sertraline, or fluoxetine. Methods: This study is a population-based cohort study of 17,297 individuals who were born between 1981 and 2005 with a depression diagnosis between 1996 and 2012. Using array-based single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data, the individuals were categorized according to their metabolizing status of CYP2C19/CYP2D6 as normal (NM, reference group), ultra-rapid- (UM), rapid- (RM), intermediate- (IM), or poor-metabolizer (PM). The outcomes were treatment switching or discontinuation, psychiatric emergency department contacts, and suicide attempt/self-harm. By using Poisson regression analyses, we have estimated the incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) that were adjusted for covariates and potential confounders, by age groups (<18 (children and adolescents), 19−25 (young adults), and 26+ years (adults)), comparing the outcomes in individuals with NM status (reference) versus the mutant metabolizer status. For statistically significant outcomes, we have calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to genotype (NNG) in order to prevent one outcome. Results: The children and adolescents who were using (es)citalopram with CYP2C19 PM status had increased risks of switching (IRR = 1.64 [95% CI: 1.10−2.43]) and suicide attempt/self-harm (IRR = 2.67 [95% CI; 1.57−4.52]). The young adults with CYP2C19 PM status who were using sertraline had an increased risk of switching (IRR = 2.06 [95% CI; 1.03−4.11]). The young adults with CYP2D6 PM status who were using fluoxetine had an increased risk of emergency department contacts (IRR = 3.28 [95% CI; 1.11−9.63]). No significant associations were detected in the adults. The NNG for preventing one suicide attempt/suicide in the children who were using (es)citalopram was 463, and the NNT was 11. Conclusion: The CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 PM phenotype statuses were associated with outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults with depression with incident new-use of (es)citalopram, sertraline, or fluoxetine, therefore indicating the utility of PGx testing, particularly in younger people, for PGx-guided antidepressant treatment.

Treatment History Characteristics Associated With Use of Isocarboxazid: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The monoamine oxidase inhibitor isocarboxazid (Marplan) is occasionally used in the treatment of depression, but there is only little knowledge on the nature of the use of isocarboxazid in clinical practice. We aimed to identify treatment history characteristics associated with this use. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Via the nationwide Danish registers, we identified all adult incident users of isocarboxazid in the period from 2001 to 2018, as well as up to 5 matched controls using another antidepressant (matched on date of redeemed prescription, age, sex, and region of residence). The 5-year treatment history of the isocarboxazid users and the controls was assessed via the Danish registers. The association between treatment history characteristics and isocarboxazid use was examined by multivariate conditional logistic regression. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We identified 1455 isocarboxazid users and 7045 controls using another antidepressant. The following characteristics were associated with statistically significant increased likelihood of receiving isocarboxazid treatment: Prior treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (odds ratio [OR], 1.80 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-2.23), a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 4.08-5.89), a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.30-1.88), a tricyclic antidepressant (OR, 5.05; 95% CI, 4.19-6.08), other antidepressants (OR, 4.74; 95% CI, 3.74-6.01), lithium (OR, 6.70; 95% CI, 5.08-8.83), an antipsychotic (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.73), and each diagnosis of depression received in relation to psychiatric hospital treatment (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.23-1.39). Forty percent of those initiating isocarboxazid had received treatment with drugs from 5 or more different psychopharmacological classes in the 5 preceding years. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that isocarboxazid is typically used for treatment-resistant depression, consistent with guideline recommendations.

Effect of antipsychotics on mortality risk in patients with dementia with and without comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the mortality risk associated with the initiation of antipsychotic treatment among patients with dementia and whether comorbidities related to the cardiovascular system and diabetes interact with antipsychotic treatment to increase the mortality risk beyond the risk of death independently associated with antipsychotics and comorbidity alone. METHODS: We designed a matched cohort study using nationwide registry data. All Danish residents aged 65-95 years diagnosed with dementia between 2009 and 2014 were included. Dementia was assessed as a first-time registered dementia diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Register or the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register and/or a first-time prescription for antidementia medication. Patients exposed to antipsychotics were matched with up to three unexposed patients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare rates of death within 180 days after the initiation of antipsychotic treatment. The models were adjusted for potential confounders. Analyses were stratified for diabetes, heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease, and we calculated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). RESULTS: The study cohort included 8244 exposed patients and 24,730 unexposed patients. A total of 5938 patients died during the first 180 days of follow-up. Patients exposed to antipsychotics had a significantly higher adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.43) than unexposed patients. Crude mortality rates were higher among patients with heart disease and diabetes when antipsychotic treatment was initiated compared with patients without comorbidities. Relative risk estimates did not differ between patients with and without heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes, and RERI suggested no positive additive interaction. Risk analysis suggested higher mortality in patients without cerebrovascular disease who initiated antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study adds to the evidence that antipsychotic treatment is associated with increased mortality and suggests that attention should be paid to all initiators of antipsychotics irrespective of cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

Life-time Actionable Pharmacogenetic Drug Use: A Population-based Cohort Study in 86 040 Young People With and Without Mental Disorders in Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: To describe life-time use of current actionable pharmacogenetic (PGx) somatic and psychotropic drugs according to international PGx consortia in people with and without hospital-diagnosed mental disorders in the Danish population. METHODS: Population- and register-based observational drug utilization study in 56 065 individuals with mental disorders, i. e. attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, bipolar disorder, depression and schizophrenia, and a random, representative sample of 29 975 individuals of the Danish population, born between 1981 and 2005. Individuals were followed from 1995 or birth until 2016 (for a maximum of 22 years). We report prevalence and incidence rates of PGx drug use by age, sex and mental disorders based on redeemed prescriptions between 1995 and 2016. RESULTS: Of the 69 PGx drugs, prescriptions of 39 drugs had been redeemed by the study population by 35 years of age. The use of at least 1 PGx drug varied between 23.1% in males without mental disorders and 97.2% in females with schizophrenia. Males with ADHD or autism were the youngest first-time PGx drug users at a mean of 11.6 years. The mean number of different PGx drugs used was 1.2 in males without mental disorders and 5.6 in individuals with schizophrenia. The prevalence of different PGx drugs linked to more than one gene was 25.3% in males without mental disorders to 94.1% in females with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: PGx drugs are commonly used by younger people, more often by individuals with mental disorders and by females. Panel-based PGx testing could contribute to treatment decisions at a very young age.

Cerebrospinal fluid test results and associations with subsequent mental disorders, neurological diseases, and CNS infections: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) immune alterations have been associated with mental disorders, neurological disease, and CNS infections; however, comprehensive large-scale longitudinal CSF studies are lacking. METHODS: By using the Clinical Laboratory Information System (LABKA) Research Database in the Central Denmark Region (1994-2012), we included 15,030 individuals tested for CSF WBC, CSF/serum albumin ratio, IgG index, total protein, albumin, or IgG with follow-up for the risk of mental disorders, psychotropic prescriptions, neurological diseases, or CNS infections, estimated by Cox regression. RESULTS: Among individuals receiving a mental disorder diagnosis (N = 1,147) after a CSF test, 30·0% had an abnormal CSF test result, while for those with a neurological disease (N = 3,201), 39·9% had abnormal test results, and among individuals with CNS infections (N = 1,276), 73·0% had abnormal test results. Individuals with abnormal CSF test results had an increased risk of mental disorders (HR = 3·20; 95%CI = 2·86-3·59), neurological diseases (HR = 12·40; 95%CI = 11·65-13·20), and CNS infections (HR = 338·59; 95%CI = 299·06-383·35) compared to individuals not registered with a CSF test. However, the risk of mental disorders was higher (P < 0·001) after CSF test results within the normal range (HR = 4·45; 95%CI = 4·08-4·86), whereas for neurological diseases (HR = 9·72; 95%CI = 9·19-10·29) and CNS infections (HR = 55·17; 95%CI = 47·12-64·60), the risk was highest after abnormal CSF test results (all P < 0·001). The risk of organic mental disorders tended to be highest in individuals with abnormal CSF test results (HR = 19·30; 95%CI = 13·44-27·71) even though not significantly different from the risk in the group of individuals with CSF test results in the normal range (HR = 13·55; 95%CI = 9·36-19·60) (P ≥ 0·05). Abnormal CSF test results were associated with an elevated risk of psychotropic prescriptions (HR = 3·91; 95%CI = 3·66-4·18), as were CSF test results within the normal range (HR = 4·26; 95%CI = 4·03-4·51) (P < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS: Immunological CSF abnormalities are associated with an increased risk of mental disorders, neurological disease, and particularly CNS infections; however, the included CSF parameters were not specific for mental disorders and the relevant CSF biomarkers in psychiatry are yet to be discovered.

Risk of hospitalization and hip fracture associated with psychotropic polypharmacy in patients with dementia: A nationwide register-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of benzodiazepines and antidepressants on the risk of hospitalization and hip fracture in patients with dementia initiating antipsychotic drug treatment. METHODS: A register-based retrospective cohort study using data on all incident dementia cases (≥65 years) initiating antipsychotic treatment as monotherapy or in combination with benzodiazepines and/or antidepressants in Denmark from 2000 to 2015. The outcomes of interest were all-cause hospitalization and hip fracture. Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for multiple variables were used to investigate risk of hospitalization and hip fracture within 180 days. RESULTS: The risk of all-cause hospitalization during 180-days follow-up was significantly increased by 55% (adjusted HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.29-1.86, p < 0.0001), when antipsychotic use was combined with benzodiazepines, when compared to antipsychotic monotherapy. The association between the combination of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines with the risk of hip fracture did not reach statistical significance (adjusted HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.99-2.26, p = 0.0534). CONCLUSIONS: The observed increased risk of all-cause hospitalization and hip fracture may indicate increased drug-related adverse events. Thus, careful and regular monitoring is needed to assess response to treatment and decrease the risk of adverse events, when antipsychotics are combined with BZDs, albeit confounding cannot be fully excluded within the current design.

Pharmacogenetic genotype and phenotype frequencies in a large Danish population-based case-cohort sample.

Pharmacogenetics aims to improve clinical care by studying the relationship between genetic variation and variable drug response. Large population-based datasets could improve our current understanding of pharmacogenetics from selected study populations. We provide real-world pharmacogenetic frequencies of genotypes and (combined) phenotypes of a large Danish population-based case-cohort sample (iPSYCH2012; data of the Integrative Psychiatric Research consortium). The genotyped sample consists of 77,684 individuals, of which 51,464 individuals had diagnoses of severe mental disorders (SMD case-cohort) and 26,220 were individuals randomly selected from the Danish population (population cohort). Array-based genotype data imputed to 8.4 million genetic variants was searched for a selected pharmacogenetic panel of 42 clinically relevant variants and a CYP2D6 gene deletion and duplication. We identified 19 of 42 variants. Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were consistent with previously reported MAFs, and did not differ between SMD cases and population cohorts. Almost all individuals carried at least one genetic variant (> 99.9%) and 87% carried three or more genetic variants. When genotypes were translated into phenotypes, also > 99.9% of individuals had at least one divergent phenotype (i.e. divergent from the common phenotypes considered normal, e.g. extensive metabolizer). The high number of identified individuals with at least one pharmacogenetic variant or divergent phenotype indicates the importance of pharmacogenetic panel-based genotyping. Combined CYP2C19-CYP2D6 phenotypes revealed that 72.7% of individuals had divergent phenotypes for one or both enzymes. As CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 have an important role in the metabolism of psychotropic drugs, this indicates the relevance of pharmacogenetic testing specifically in individuals using psychotropic drugs.

Declining Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in People with Dementia from 2000 to 2015: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Nationwide Register-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown declining use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), medication where risks associated with use outweigh potential benefits in older people. However, the trend in people with dementia remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the use of PIM has decreased in people with dementia in line with the declining use in the general older population. METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional register-based study of the entire Danish population aged ≥65 years (2000: N = 802,106; 2015: N = 1,056,476). PIM was identified using the Danish "Red-yellow-green list". Changes in the use of PIM were examined by calculating the annual prevalence of filling prescriptions for at least one PIM in older people with and without dementia. Characteristics of the study population were examined annually including comorbidity. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2015, the prevalence of PIM use decreased from 54.7%to 43.5%in people with dementia and from 39.5%to 28.8%in people without dementia; the decrease was significant across all age groups and remained so in a sensitivity analysis where antipsychotics were removed. During the same period, comorbidity scores increased in people with and without dementia. CONCLUSION: The declining use of PIM in people with dementia from 2000 to 2015 parallels the trend in the general older population. The use of PIM decreased despite increasing levels of comorbidity and was not solely attributable to the decreasing use of antipsychotics in people with dementia. However, PIM use remained more widespread in people with dementia who may be more vulnerable to the risks associated with PIM.